Official Rome Thread  

Page 5 / 5 Prev
  RSS

black bnr32
(@blackbnr32)
Member Forum Superstar!
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 204
28/03/2019 5:44 pm  

People still hand flex?


ReplyQuote
unsuspected
(@unsuspected)
Swedish juggernaut Forum Superstar!
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 585
29/03/2019 12:41 am  

No Blur in 162 next season only 164w :/

180cm (5'11") I 102kg (222lbs) I 265MP (8,5US)
Go wide!


ReplyQuote
Elektropow
(@elektropow)
Member Forum Superstar!
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 541
29/03/2019 12:49 am  
Posted by: black bnr32

People still hand flex?

Of course! People also realize it doesn't mean much, but can be an indicator. I also ass flex from time to time.


ReplyQuote
Vanni
(@vanni)
Member Forum Superstar!
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 240
29/03/2019 2:38 am  
Posted by: black bnr32

People still hand flex?

I do it all the time 😀 

skidding turns since 2011


ReplyQuote
Vanni
(@vanni)
Member Forum Superstar!
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 240
30/03/2019 1:05 pm  

it is always interesting for me to listen Maravetz talk techy stuff

skidding turns since 2011


ReplyQuote
Steezy
(@steezy)
Member Forum Superstar!
Joined: 2 weeks ago
Posts: 5
10/04/2019 10:06 pm  

Just picked up a 2019 Mod on steep discount and can't wait to ride it, though may have to wait until next season. Seen good reviews and miss the traditional camber profiles of old. Heard its close to a Custom X and I rode an old Custom directional for years so stoked to try it. My first Rome board and can't wait to get that thing on edge. 🙂 


Vanni liked
ReplyQuote
Alexxx
(@alexxx)
Member Forum Superstar!
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 251
11/04/2019 12:54 am  

I’ve been riding the National Björn Leines this season. Nothing fancy or groundbreaking but a great allrounder. A nice open sidecut so it holds a carve quite well but it’s not that stiff torsionally and I can also muscle it through tighter turns when I want. Great pop and stability too. Even does ok in pow for a twin. I hadn’t had a chance to try the regular National before I pulled the trigger on the BL but with a slightly less stiff tips it would seem to be pretty great as well, maybe a touch more playful

This post was modified 2 weeks ago by Alexxx

Steezy and Elektropow liked
ReplyQuote
kimchi
(@kimchi)
Member Forum Superstar!
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 410
13/04/2019 2:24 pm  
Posted by: kimchi

So update on the Blur, I've ridden it pretty sparingly this season just because there's been so much pow. I rode my Moss PQ54 and United Shapes Cadet instead. I rode the Blur for my first full day in months at Northstar and it felt a little off to me. I think it's just from having gotten used to the looser, flowier style of the Moss and Cadet. I'm rocketing around in straight lines less and focusing more on turns in moderate terrain than I was early last season. I can do that sort of riding on the Blur, but it's a much more powerful board than it is a "flow-y" board and the feel of the turn is completely different.

I need to get the Blur back out on a bigger mountain (want to hit Squaw and Mammoth at some point this season) to get a feel back for it. Still a sick board, but right now questioning whether it has a place in the quiver for my evolving style of riding. Might no longer be an daily driver but instead something for days at steeper resorts or crud snow.

Update: currently putting 20k+ vert on the Blur 162 today and remembering why I love this board. Holds up in bullet proof and spring slush. Pretty easy (if not graceful) to ride at slow speeds, but holds up at 50+ mph. I trust it much more than my Cadet 162 (9 more cm of effective edge!) in sketchy conditions. 


Vanni and Steezy liked
ReplyQuote
tierarzt
(@tierarzt)
Member Forum Superstar!
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 349
14/04/2019 2:01 pm  

Damn, don't tempt me. I've already bought one board this season but the Blur sounds so good. It looks like a classic, 'normal' directional board hiding in that pointed nose/cutaway tail shape. A lot of effective edge for a modern board. 


ReplyQuote
kimchi
(@kimchi)
Member Forum Superstar!
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 410
15/04/2019 9:59 am  
Posted by: Tom

Damn, don't tempt me. I've already bought one board this season but the Blur sounds so good. It looks like a classic, 'normal' directional board hiding in that pointed nose/cutaway tail shape. A lot of effective edge for a modern board. 

Haha, if it's any consolation I do have a couple complaints with the Blur. It seems a tad fragile and I wish the nose was a little stiffer. It's folded on me a couple times in deep carves in chunkier snow. But on the whole, love the board. Easy to ride but holds up at speed. Like you said, rides way more normal than you'd expect from the shape. Ton of edge, lot of confidence in firmer conditions.


ReplyQuote
Spenser
(@spenser)
Member Forum Superstar!
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2014
18/04/2019 8:58 pm  

Pretty easy to see that the nose and tail shape are just an aesthetic, and it’s really just a normal, barely directional board for riding on a mountain.

*Not trying to take away from the idea that it’s a great deck, just saying

This post was modified 6 days ago by Spenser

Vanni liked
ReplyQuote
Page 5 / 5 Prev
Share: